Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Radiological Health ; (6): 569-572, 2023.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-1003566

ABSTRACT

Objective To preliminarily study the effectiveness and safety of stereotactic ablative brachytherapy (SABT) for lung metastases from cervical cancer. Methods We analyzed the clinical data of 18 patients with cervical cancer with lung metastasis treated with SABT to compare gross tumor volume (VGTV) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) antigen before and after SABT. The clinical benefit rate (CBR) and adverse reactions were recorded. Results After SABT treatment, there were significant decreases in VGTV (t=1.708, P<0.05) and the SCC antigen level (t=1.704, P<0.05). CBR reached 94.4%. Adverse reactions of grades 3-4 did not occur in any patient. Fourteen patients had mild complications, including 1 case of bloody sputum and 1 case of a small pneumothorax. Ten cases developed mild radiation-induced lung injury, with grade 2 radiation pneumonitis in 4 cases. The Karnofsky performance status score and needle depth were not associated with the occurrence of adverse reactions, while the radius of GTV and interstitial lung disease were associated with the occurrence of adverse reactions. Conclusion SABT is a safe and effective alternative to the treatment of lung metastases from cervical cancer.

2.
Chinese Journal of Radiological Health ; (6): 279-283, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-973404

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the effect of different fractionated radiotherapy of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) and conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) on peripheral blood lymphocytes in patients with breast cancer. Methods This retrospective analysis enrolled 40 patients with early breast cancer who underwent radiotherapy post breast conserving surgery in Xuzhou Central Hospital from November 2019 to August 2021. The patients were randomly divided into the observation group (HFRT, n = 20) and the control group (CFRT, n = 20). Changes in peripheral blood lymphocyte count (PLC) before and during radiotherapy were compared between the two groups. Results The baseline PLC was comparable between the observation group and the control group (1.53 ± 0.54 vs 1.64 ± 0.56, P > 0.05). In both groups, the PLC declined steadily during radiotherapy, and the incidence of lymphopenia in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (32.5% vs 50.0%, P > 0.05); the PLC nadir was higher in the observation group than in the control group (0.91 ± 0.28 vs 0.55 ± 0.22, P < 0.001). The ratio of the PLC nadir during treatment to baseline was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (0.64 ± 0.24 vs 0.38 ± 0.21, P < 0.05). Conclusion Patients with breast cancer receiving HFRT show a lower risk of radiation-induced lymphopenia versus those receiving CFRT.

3.
Chinese Journal of Radiological Health ; (6): 345-349, 2021.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-974379

ABSTRACT

Objective To explore the optimal radiotherapy method by comparing the dosimetric differences of target and organs at risk of four radiotherapy plans for left sided breast cancerafter breast-conserving surgery. Methods Twenty-three patients with left breast cancer were randomly selected and given PTV 25 fractions, 50 Gy prescription dose.TheHybrid_IMRT, rj_IMRT, VMAT and t_VMAT plans were designed for each patients. Dosimetric differences were compared, including dose volume histograms of target and OARs, target homogeneity indexes (HI), conformal indexes (CI) and the machine MUs. Results Target Dosimetric comparison, HI: t_VMAT plan target has highest HI and had significant difference (P ≤ 0.001); The target CI of VMAT plans were 0.967 ± 0.016, had significant difference compared with the other 3 plans (P < 0.05). The CI of rj_ IMRT were 0.942 ± 0.018 better than that of IMRT and t_VMATs. Dosimetric comparison of OARs, left_lung mean dose (MLD_L): rj_IMRT were (8.76 ± 1.52) Gy which were best of 4 plans, and had statistical significance (P < 0.05). Heart mean dose: rj_IMRT were (4.68 ± 0.87) Gy were better than that of VMAT (P < 0.05). Conclusion All of these four plans could be applied in clinical treatments, while the limitations of treatment equipment, patients’ physical conditions and some other factors should be considered before selecting an appropriate one.

4.
Chinese Journal of Radiological Health ; (6): 303-308, 2021.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-974372

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the dosimetric difference between the biological function based on equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and the physical function based on dose volume (DV) in the intensity modulated radiotherapy for stage Ⅲ non-small cell lung cancer. Methods Four different radiotherapy plans were designed for 15 stage Ⅲ non-small cell lung cancer patients: Group A, physical function optimization (DV + DV) was used for target area and organs at risk; GroupB, in the target region, biological function optimization conditions were added on the basis of physical function optimization, and physical function optimization of organs at risk (DV-EUD + DV) was added. Group C, biological function optimization (EUD + EUD) was used for target area and organs at risk. Group D, in the target area, physical function optimization conditions were added on the basis of biological function optimization, and biological function optimization of organs at risk (EUD-DV + DV) was added. The differences in dosimetric parameters of the four plans were compared. Results Target area: PTV: D2%, D98%, D50%, D105% and Dmax values of group C (P < 0.05) is the highest while group B and group D were relatively small (P > 0.05); The homogeneity index: the results of the group B and the group D were better than those of the other two groups (P < 0.05). conformity index: The results of the four groups were similar (P>0.05). Organ at risk: lung tissue mean dose (MLD), V5, V10, V20, V30 and heart V30, V40, Dmean dose parameters were similar (P > 0.05). Spinalcord: Group C and group D D1% were better than the other two groups (P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in the number ofmonitor unit (MU) among the four groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion The optimization method combining physical and biological function optimization in the target area can improve the conformity of the target area on the premise of ensuring the treatment. The Spinalcord load would be significantly reduced when using biological function optimization or the combination of biological function and physical function optimization.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL